Facebook

Showing posts with label Online Advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Online Advertising. Show all posts

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Top 10 Eccentric Buildings...

In a world of bland, corporate buildings...
thank goodness for those architects & designers who express their individuality.
They brighten up our world.
From works of art to the downright wacky, here is a list, some of which I have been fortunate to see in the flesh.

10. Guggenheim Museum – Bilbao, Spain

guggenheim-museum

No list is possible without the architect Frank Gehry. Built alongside the Nervion River, the curves are typical Gehry and were designed to catch the light. The museum, opened to the public in 1997, exhibits Spanish and international artists and the unusual design made it an important tourist attraction for the town. Gehry wanted the design to resemble a ship in honour of Bilbao’s status as a port. The building is made of limestone and glass, and titanium panels made to look like fish scales.

9. Dali Theatre and Museum – Figueras, Spain

dali-theatre-museum

Another Spanish art museum, this houses the largest collection of Salvador Dali’s artwork in the world. Figueras was the artist’s birthplace and he wanted to rebuild the old theatre from the ruins left by the bombs of the Spanish Civil War. The museum opened in 1974 and was expanded through the 1980s. Dali supervised the design, which matched the eccentricity of his paintings and sculptures, particularly in the giant eggs on the roof. Dali’s crypt is in the basement.

8. Turning the Place Over – Liverpool, England

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/25/Turning_the_place_over.jpg

This is an art installation contained within a derelict building, which has served as an attraction during Liverpool’s tenure as European City of Culture. Sculptor Richard Wilson’s creation surprises passers-by. An oval shaped 8-metre diameter section of the wall was cut and made to spin round on a pivot to reveal the interior of the building.

7. The Mushroom Tree House – Cincinnati, Ohio

mushroom-house

This other worldly construction looks as if it was transplanted from a children's picture book. It doesn’t appear to have been built at all and looks like it sprung up from the ground. The effect was achieved by the former Professor of Architecture and Interior Design at the University of Cincinnati, the late Terry Brown. Brown’s students helped with the project and were graded for it. It can be found in the Hyde Park district of the city.

6. Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Building – Branson, Missouri

ripleys-believe-it-or-not-building

The Branson museum is one of a chain of museums, housing the bizarre artifacts owned by the Ripley franchise. The building was designed to commemorate the devastating earthquake, which registered over 8.0 on the Richter Scale, in 1812 in New Madrid, Missouri. The crack across the building gives the impression that it has just survived its own earthquake. The Ripley’s Believe It Or Not Museum in Orlando, Florida is designed to appear as if it is sinking into the ground.

5. The Robot Building – Bangkok, Thailand

robot-building

The robotic design, by the architect Sumet Jumsai, houses the United Overseas Bank headquarters. Located in the Sathorn business district, it was completed in 1986 when contemporary design was in vogue. It’s a friendly looking robot with lidded eyeballs for windows. The architect’s remit was to design something that made a statement about the modern, computerised nature of banking.

4. Sagrada Familia – Barcelona, Spain

http://www.perfecttravelblog.com/Desktop/la_sagrada_familia1-wallpaper_032020080210.jpg

Many visitors go to Barcelona just to see the work of the architect, Antoni Gaudi. He didn’t like straight lines and he avoided them whenever possible! His most ambitious construction, the Sagrada Familia Roman Catholic Church is still to be finished. Gaudi worked on it from 1852 until his death in 1926. It is scheduled to be open to the public for worship in 2010. Its towers are the most iconic image of Barcelona and it looks as if it belongs in a fairy story. The church is full of Christian symbolism, dedicated to the saints. Gaudi’s other famous Barcelona landmarks include Casa Mila and Park Guell.

3. The Basket Building – Newark, Ohio

basket-office

Not many people get to work in a replica of a hand woven gift basket! This environment is headquarters to the Longaberger Company, a successful basket manufacturer. The founder, Dave Longaberger, wanted all his company buildings to be in the shape of a basket but his daughters countered his wishes following his death. However, this 7-story replica of one of the company’s products is not the only giant Longaberger basket in the area. Dave had also instigated the Apple Basket in Frazeysburg, the house sized Picnic Basket in Dresden, and the Big Easter Basket in Lorain.

2. The Crooked House – Sopot, Poland

crooked-house

The architectural firm of Szotynscy Zaleski took inspiration from fairytale illustrations and from the designs of Spanish architect, Antoni Gaudi to design this remarkable construction. The roof is covered with bluish green enamelled shingles that look like dragon scales. The interior is conventional and contains bars, shops and cafes.

1. The Dancing House – Prague, Czech Republic

dancinghouse

Tourists from all over the world come to marvel at the beautiful churches and other historic buildings in Prague, so they are surprised to find this contemporary gem. It houses the Nationale-Nederlanden insurance company and was designed by Vlado Milunic and Frank Gehry. Construction was between 1992 and 1996 and was endorsed by the President of the Czech Republic, Vaclav Havel. A French restaurant occupies the roof, affording magnificent views over the city. Other nicknames for the building include the Fred and Ginger, and the Drunk House.

Source: Anne Iredale

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Design style...

Your fliers look better...

FB flier 2

Your signage looks better...

Andrea Gressinger Sign

Your post card/business card combination looks better...

MM aw

Your social media networking looks better..

Matt Paul IMAGE/BRANDING

Your logos look better...
Brand, Logo, Image

Your branding looks better...


ColetteCHing

Your html works better...
Ashley

Overall, BETTER is good and EFFECTIVE is the end result.
I GUARANTEE that!


Vincent Medina ~
310 251 9728

or email me

Friday, August 27, 2010

TOP TEN TWEETS!

















1. Architecture affects mood & creativity? ||
http://blog.ounodesign.com/2009/05/02/how-rooms-and-architecture-affect-mood-and-creativity/ ||

2. TIME TO INVEST? ||http://economist.com/node/16846514?story_id=16846514&CFID=141267706&CFTOKEN=38937858 ||~• http://ArtfulMind.Biz •~||

3. Always a fan of great music... Pavane by Gabriel Fauré || http://youtube.com/watch?v=xUsGh2xYYQg || Great Stuff Is Just A CLICK Away! •~||

4. CREATIVITY that inspires... || http://bit.ly/PDC4Z || http://ArtfulMind.Biz || Great Stuff Is Just A CLICK Away!

5. Know thy neighbor...it pays! http://hubpages.com/hub/Do-You-Know-Your-Neighbor || Great Stuff's Just A CLICK Away! || http://ArtfulMind.Biz

6. Know your dog...age chart: http://bit.ly/am4isJ || Great Stuff Is Just A CLICK Away! || http://ArtfulMind.Biz

7. Who's all about the luck of the draw? RT @onlinepoker Poker: Luck vs Skill Infographic http://bit.ly/9AJrCN || http://ArtfulMind.Biz

8. Design For Six Sigma DFSS vs DMAIC http://artfulminddotbiz.blogspot.com/2010/08/design-for-six-sigma-dfss-versus-dmaic.html | Great Stuff!

9. REFLECT! Reach Your Full Potential: http://letsreflect.com/about.php via @addthis || Keep Moving Forward! || http://artfulmind.biz

10. A Day In The Life... http://onlineeducation.net/internet || Keep Moving Forward. That's How Winning Is Done! || http://ArtfulMind.biz

Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) Versus DMAIC

magazine


Troubled with the acronyms of Six Sigma? We'll help you figure out new product design (DFSS) from existing process improvement (DMAIC). Learn the many methodologies of Design For Six Sigma, and see how they compare to DMAIC.

One of the most confusing issues associated with someone saying "I'm using Six Sigma" has to do with what methodology they are actually using. A majority of the time they are using the DMAIC methodology, because they have existing processes that are wasting resources (hence the big savings you've heard about at GE, Honeywell and others over the past years). The remaining minority of Six Sigma practitioners are using a Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) approach to design a new product for Six Sigma quality.

What Is DMAIC?
When most people refer to Six Sigma, they are in fact referring to the DMAIC methodology. The DMAIC methodology should be used when a product or process is in existence at your company but is not meeting customer specification or is not performing adequately.

The DMAIC methodology is almost universally recognized and defined as comprising of the following five phases: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. In some businesses, only four phases (Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control) are used; in this case the Define deliverables are then considered pre-work for the project or are included within the Measure phase. I have even heard of DMAIIC, where the first I stands for Improve and the second I stands for Implement.

The DMAIC methodology breaks down as follows:
Define
the project goals and customer (internal and external) requirements.
Measure
the process to determine current performance.
Analyze
and determine the root cause(s) of the defects.
Improve
the process by eliminating defect root causes.
Control
future process performance.

What Is DFSS?
DFSS is the acronym for Design For Six Sigma. Unlike the DMAIC methodology, the phases or steps of DFSS are not universally recognized or defined -- almost every company or training organization will define DFSS differently. Many times a company will implement DFSS to suit their business, industry and culture; other times they will implement the version of DFSS used by the consulting company assisting in the deployment. Because of this, DFSS is more of an approach than a defined methodology.

DFSS is used to design or re-design a product or service from the ground up. The expected process Sigma level for a DFSS product or service is at least 4.5 (no more than approximately 1 defect per thousand opportunities), but can be 6 Sigma or higher depending the product. Producing such a low defect level from product or service launch means that customer expectations and needs (CTQs) must be completely understood before a design can be completed and implemented.

One popular Design for Six Sigma methodology is called DMADV, and retains the same number of letters, number of phases, and general feel as the DMAIC acronym. It rolls off the tongue (duh-mad-vee) in the same fashion as DMAIC (duh-may-ick). The five phases of DMADV are defined as: Define, Measure, Analyze, Design and Verify.
Define
the project goals and customer (internal and external) requirements.
Measure
and determine customer needs and specifications; benchmark competitors and industry.
Analyze
the process options to meet the customer needs.
Design
(detailed) the process to meet the customer needs.
Verify
the design performance and ability to meet customer needs.

A slight modification on the DMADV methodology is DMADOV (see Discussion Forum sidebar): Define, Measure, Analyze, Design, Optimize and Verify.

There are a few other "flavors" of DFSS that you might be interested to know about: DCCDI, IDOV and DMEDI.

DCCDI is being popularized by Geoff Tennant and is defined as Define, Customer Concept, Design and Implement. You can see that there are many similarities between these phases and the DMADV phases.
Define
the project goals.
Customer
analysis is completed.
Concept
ideas are developed, reviewed and selected.
Design
is performed to meet the customer and business specifications.
Implementation
is completed to develop and commercialize the product/service.

IDOV is a well known design methodology, especially in the manufacturing world. The IDOV acronym is defined as Identify, Design, Optimize and Validate.
Identify
the customer and specifications (CTQs).
Design
translates the customer CTQs into functional requirements and into solution alternatives. A selection process whittles down the list of solutions to the "best" solution.
Optimize
uses advanced statistical tools and modeling to predict and optimize the design and performance.
Validate
makes sure that the design you've developed will meet the customer CTQs.

DMEDI is being taught by PricewaterhouseCoopers and stands for Define, Measure, Explore, Develop and Implement. I'm sure you won't have much trouble identifying the main objectives in each of these phases based on the title of each phase.

As you can see, the DFSS approach can utilize any of the many possible methodologies. The fact is that all of these DFSS methodologies use the same advanced design tools (Quality Function Deployment, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, benchmarking, Design of Experiments, simulation, statistical optimization, error proofing, Robust Design, etc.). Each methodology primarily differs in the name of each phase and the number of phases (and, of course, the acronym).

How do you decide which DFSS methodology to use? If you're hiring a consulting company to help with your deployment, use their methodology as their training materials will be tailored around it. If you are implementing DFSS on your own, any of the DFSS books available should get you moving in the right direction. In any case, following a detailed DFSS methodology will help you achieve high quality levels for new products and services. If you are interested in improving your existing products or services, DMAIC is a more appropriate methodology to use.

source: isixsigma.com